As a follower of the TMTE sector firms, I happened to browse through the Japanese telco Softbank offering presentation for its 70% acquisition for the USA wireless telecom operator Sprint. It had interesting facts on the USA market like AT&T/Verizon duopoly wrt subscribers and EBITDA(67% subscribers and 82% EBITDA), low mobile data speeds of 1Mbps vs markets like UK/Australia, high postpaid base etc. The comparison of USA/UK/Japan with BRIC was an eye opener. Read the entire presentation at http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101830/000119312513228092/d541834d425.htm
However, what really caught my attention were these two graphs breaking down estimated deal synergies. Many talk about synergies but few walk the talk while publicly stating it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b24d9/b24d9fbf1a046276ba66990303e5667dab4b4946" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/684b2/684b2850e52aa2e4e014d23eef45f7303ff45a31" alt=""
What is really stunning is the estimated opex synergies of $2bn from 2014-2017, and then $3bn beyond. of this, they estimate nearly 40% from device procurement-really I would not have thought devices margins are so high.Another 49% rests from their knowledge transfer on network opex, churn and customer care-all performance drivers of telecom. IT is probably non incremental since vendors are quite efficient there unlike for other components.
For capex, purchasing synergies again constitute 42% of estimated synergies, while knowledge management of traffic and core building would give another 42%.
Here, they have built on their core strengths of networks and smart management while deriving the synergies. The next time a telecom CEO wants to defend that pricy acquisition, then such graphs are a good start,
No comments:
Post a Comment